| | (SWL)vs.[FOG] |  |
|
+5SplINteR GALAXehBOY Vulcid (FOG)White-Wizard (ֆᎳᏞ)**ᏴᏫֆֆ** 9 posters |
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
(ֆᎳᏞ)**ᏴᏫֆֆ**
Posts : 20
Likes : 0
Join date : 2013-12-01
|  Subject: (SWL)vs.[FOG] ![(SWL)vs.[FOG] Icon_minitime](https://2img.net/i/fa/icon_minitime.gif) Mon Dec 02, 2013 8:52 pm | |
| [FOG] Map --- (SWL) Faction
(SWL) Coruscant (Conquest) --- [FOG] Faction
[FOG] Map --- (SWL) Faction
(SWL) Mustafar (CTF) --- [FOG] Faction
[FOG] Map --- (SWL) Faction
Rules:
~Team damage on.
~Only Galactic Civil War.
~No glitching.
~No bots...
~60 second warm up timer.
~Reinforcements must be set to no more than 300% and no less than 150%.
~No tanks.
~No turrets (auto turrets are allowed).
~No specials (may be flexible).
~No spawn jumping the warm-up timer.
~If someone lags out, the map can be restarted if the player does not join back right away and both clans do not agree to continue after he rejoins.
We have a non-paid for server. We may be able to use JOG's server?? Tell us a time. | |
|
| | |
(FOG)White-Wizard
Sith Lord God of the Game
Posts : 278
Likes : 3
Join date : 2013-02-19
Age : 27
| | Subject: Re: (SWL)vs.[FOG] Mon Dec 02, 2013 9:03 pm | |
| Lets look at this for Christmas break time. :p | |
|
| | |
Vulcid
Posts : 65
Likes : 0
Join date : 2013-11-30
Age : 27
Location : Atlanta, GA
| | Subject: Re: (SWL)vs.[FOG] Mon Dec 02, 2013 9:27 pm | |
| i decline those rules, they are bullshit... | |
|
| | |
(ֆᎳᏞ)**ᏴᏫֆֆ**
Posts : 20
Likes : 0
Join date : 2013-12-01
| | Subject: Re: (SWL)vs.[FOG] Mon Dec 02, 2013 10:48 pm | |
| - Vulcid wrote:
- i decline those rules, they are bullshit...
To which specific ones are you referring to? | |
|
| | |
Vulcid
Posts : 65
Likes : 0
Join date : 2013-11-30
Age : 27
Location : Atlanta, GA
| | Subject: Re: (SWL)vs.[FOG] Mon Dec 02, 2013 11:10 pm | |
| | |
|
| | |
GALAXehBOY
Posts : 27
Likes : 0
Join date : 2013-11-30
Age : 25
Location : dat TYGA though
| | Subject: Re: (SWL)vs.[FOG] Mon Dec 02, 2013 11:22 pm | |
| - (ֆᎳᏞ)**ᏴᏫֆֆ** wrote:
- [FOG] Map --- (SWL) Faction
(SWL) Coruscant (Conquest) --- [FOG] Faction
[FOG] Map --- (SWL) Faction
(SWL) Mustafar (CTF) --- [FOG] Faction
[FOG] Map --- (SWL) Faction
Rules:
~Team damage on.
~Only Galactic Civil War.
~No glitching.
~No bots...
~60 second warm up timer.
~Reinforcements must be set to no more than 300% and no less than 150%.
~No tanks.
~No turrets (auto turrets are allowed).
~No specials (may be flexible).
~No spawn jumping the warm-up timer.
~If someone lags out, the map can be restarted if the player does not join back right away and both clans do not agree to continue after he rejoins.
We have a non-paid for server. We may be able to use JOG's server?? Tell us a time. RED= NO WAY | |
|
| | |
Vulcid
Posts : 65
Likes : 0
Join date : 2013-11-30
Age : 27
Location : Atlanta, GA
| | Subject: Re: (SWL)vs.[FOG] Mon Dec 02, 2013 11:23 pm | |
| | |
|
| | |
(ֆᎳᏞ)**ᏴᏫֆֆ**
Posts : 20
Likes : 0
Join date : 2013-12-01
| | Subject: Re: (SWL)vs.[FOG] Mon Dec 02, 2013 11:43 pm | |
| Lol you want to do a clan battle with team damage off? wth td off is for people who don't know how to play TD on...
Tanks... I mean we're interested in aiming and team capabilities, not being cheap and nooby.
As for Specials, sure we'll do specs on. | |
|
| | |
Vulcid
Posts : 65
Likes : 0
Join date : 2013-11-30
Age : 27
Location : Atlanta, GA
| | Subject: Re: (SWL)vs.[FOG] Mon Dec 02, 2013 11:44 pm | |
| lol tanks define the game, you can kill them easy, you are mad cause you dont know HOW to use tanks and drive i bet | |
|
| | |
(ֆᎳᏞ)**ᏴᏫֆֆ**
Posts : 20
Likes : 0
Join date : 2013-12-01
| | Subject: Re: (SWL)vs.[FOG] Tue Dec 03, 2013 12:36 am | |
| Um bro, why don't we play a bit before call me a noob?  I'd really like to not have Tanks enabled for a clan battle. | |
|
| | |
(FOG)White-Wizard
Sith Lord God of the Game
Posts : 278
Likes : 3
Join date : 2013-02-19
Age : 27
| | Subject: Re: (SWL)vs.[FOG] Tue Dec 03, 2013 12:59 am | |
| You all need to chill. I don't want specs on, takes more skill without them. As for team damage I prefer it on, but I also don't care that much. | |
|
| | |
SplINteR
Posts : 43
Likes : 6
Join date : 2013-02-20
Age : 29
Location : Oklahoma
| | Subject: Re: (SWL)vs.[FOG] Tue Dec 03, 2013 1:04 am | |
| Tanks won't be on, you're fucking trash if you think they should be on. CW is a bullshit faction entirely geared toward the Magna guard. Idc about specs being on or off, but you are seriously terrible if you want the other rules removed. | |
|
| | |
Vulcid
Posts : 65
Likes : 0
Join date : 2013-11-30
Age : 27
Location : Atlanta, GA
| | Subject: Re: (SWL)vs.[FOG] Tue Dec 03, 2013 1:10 am | |
| xD i know the rules lol! i wanted to stir the pot, you guys can count on me. | |
|
| | |
(ֆᎳᏞ)**ᏴᏫֆֆ**
Posts : 20
Likes : 0
Join date : 2013-12-01
| | Subject: Re: (SWL)vs.[FOG] Tue Dec 03, 2013 2:48 am | |
| Glad we got that cleared up. Could you reply to the maps and factions and give me a date & time? | |
|
| | |
[NH]Shadow
Posts : 1
Likes : 0
Join date : 2013-10-09
| | Subject: Re: (SWL)vs.[FOG] Tue Dec 03, 2013 5:44 pm | |
| - SplINteR wrote:
- Tanks won't be on, you're fucking trash if you think they should be on. CW is a bullshit faction entirely geared toward the Magna guard. Idc about specs being on or off, but you are seriously terrible if you want the other rules removed.
Lol ^ | |
|
| | |
(FOG)White-Wizard
Sith Lord God of the Game
Posts : 278
Likes : 3
Join date : 2013-02-19
Age : 27
| | Subject: Re: (SWL)vs.[FOG] Tue Dec 03, 2013 6:01 pm | |
| I shall talk it over with my team mates. We will get back to you | |
|
| | |
mayhem
Posts : 18
Likes : -1
Join date : 2013-05-11
| | Subject: Re: (SWL)vs.[FOG] Tue Dec 03, 2013 9:10 pm | |
| we should 1 speacil and no fucking 60 min warm up time. I am done with the rest but other was i will say no to the following rules.... | |
|
| | |
GALAXehBOY
Posts : 27
Likes : 0
Join date : 2013-11-30
Age : 25
Location : dat TYGA though
| | Subject: Re: (SWL)vs.[FOG] Tue Dec 03, 2013 10:50 pm | |
| Can we have not everything galactic civil war please though? | |
|
| | |
Vulcid
Posts : 65
Likes : 0
Join date : 2013-11-30
Age : 27
Location : Atlanta, GA
| | Subject: Re: (SWL)vs.[FOG] Tue Dec 03, 2013 11:51 pm | |
| nah GCS is better than cloners though | |
|
| | |
(FOG)White-Wizard
Sith Lord God of the Game
Posts : 278
Likes : 3
Join date : 2013-02-19
Age : 27
| | Subject: Re: (SWL)vs.[FOG] Wed Dec 04, 2013 1:08 am | |
| I normally don't play any clone v droid. But hey why not play one map of it? | |
|
| | |
(ֆᎳᏞ)**ᏴᏫֆֆ**
Posts : 20
Likes : 0
Join date : 2013-12-01
| | Subject: Re: (SWL)vs.[FOG] Wed Dec 04, 2013 1:09 pm | |
| - mayhem wrote:
- we should 1 speacil and no fucking 60 min warm up time. I am done with the rest but other was i will say no to the following rules....
It is a 60 SECOND warm up timer to wait for everyone to be in the server before we continue the next map to avoid any problems. We could do 1 person who plays specials that's up to you. Why not just do GCW and leave it at that  XP | |
|
| | |
-Syler-
Admin
Posts : 51
Likes : 0
Join date : 2013-05-16
Age : 29
Location : Minnesota
| | Subject: Re: (SWL)vs.[FOG] Wed Dec 04, 2013 2:14 pm | |
| - Vulcid wrote:
- i decline those rules, they are bullshit...
These are the rules by which PS2 uses | |
|
| | |
(FOG)White-Wizard
Sith Lord God of the Game
Posts : 278
Likes : 3
Join date : 2013-02-19
Age : 27
| | Subject: Re: (SWL)vs.[FOG] Wed Dec 04, 2013 5:56 pm | |
| PC and Ps2 have different rules to some point, don't ever forget this is not BoT or R, we play pc. And while I have one of the better Darkis on pc I find it sort of annoying to play any specs in a scrim. I mean if one person has a lucky roll and gets it first life, then the other players have to deal with wookies and crap. It is not fun. | |
|
| | |
(ֆᎳᏞ)**ᏴᏫֆֆ**
Posts : 20
Likes : 0
Join date : 2013-12-01
| | Subject: Re: (SWL)vs.[FOG] Thu Dec 05, 2013 1:44 am | |
| Okay, no specs. Let me know when you have a time lol | |
|
| | |
SplINteR
Posts : 43
Likes : 6
Join date : 2013-02-20
Age : 29
Location : Oklahoma
| | Subject: Re: (SWL)vs.[FOG] Thu Dec 05, 2013 11:47 am | |
| I'm not playing on CW, just saying that now. | |
|
| | |
Sponsored content
| | Subject: Re: (SWL)vs.[FOG] | |
| |
|
| | |
| | (SWL)vs.[FOG] | |
|
![(SWL)vs.[FOG] I_vote_lcap](https://2img.net/s/t/12/16/97/i_vote_lcap.jpg){kind=small}
![(SWL)vs.[FOG] I_voting_bar](https://2img.net/s/t/12/16/97/i_voting_bar.jpg){kind=small}
![(SWL)vs.[FOG] I_vote_rcap](https://2img.net/s/t/12/16/97/i_vote_rcap.jpg){kind=small}